Death penalty supporters, foes argue over $14M cost estimate

(WJHG)
Published: Sep. 14, 2016 at 1:29 PM CDT
Email This Link
Share on Pinterest
Share on LinkedIn

Attorney General Doug Peterson is taking new shots at a study that says Nebraska's death penalty costs $14.6 million per year, but the economist who conducted it is standing by his work.

Peterson sought Wednesday to discredit the study, saying it inflated defense and housing costs of death row inmates and the number of court days spent on capital punishment cases.

The Republican attorney general supports the death penalty and criticized the Legislature's decision to abolish it. Voters will decide whether to overturn that decision in November.

"Overstating the number of days to select a jury, overstating the number of days of trials, substantially over stating those numbers," Peterson said of the study.

Creighton University economist Ernie Goss says his study is scientifically valid, based on census data from Nebraska's 93 counties.

Senator Kate Bolz responded to the attorney general later in the day.

"At a specific period of time where we are even asking our administrative agencies to find one percent in their budgets to save this year I think the economic analysis regarding repealing the death penalty is persuasive and significant," she said.

And later Wednesday, the Lincoln Independent Business association held a debate on the death penalty, where both proponents and those who oppose reinstating the practice spoke their mind.

"The drugs needed to carry these out are impossible to get, that the governor has not been able to get it despite his representations to do so, and we have a broken system," Senator Colby Coash said.

Below, you can see which members of the legislature are up for re-election, how they voted last regarding the death penalty, and how they fared in the May primary.

Last year, the legislature voted to repeal the death penalty in Legislative Bill 268. Gov. Pete Ricketts vetoed that legislation. This is how the senators voted following that veto on whether to override the governor's decision.

 

Voting for LB268

Baker – FOR OVERRIDE
Bolz – FOR OVERRIDE
Campbell – FOR OVERRIDE
Chambers – FOR OVERRIDE
Coash – FOR OVERRIDE
Cook – FOR OVERRIDE
Crawford – FOR OVERRIDE
Davis – FOR OVERRIDE
Ebke – FOR OVERRIDE
Garrett – FOR OVERRIDE
Gloor – FOR OVERRIDE
Haar, K – FOR OVERRIDE
Hadley – FOR OVERRIDE
Hansen – FOR OVERRIDE
Harr, B – FOR OVERRIDE
Hilkemann – FOR OVERRIDE
Howard – FOR OVERRIDE
Johnson – AGAINST OVERRIDE
Kolowski – FOR OVERRIDE
Kolterman – FOR OVERRIDE
Krist – FOR OVERRIDE
Lindstrom – FOR OVERRIDE
McCollister – FOR OVERRIDE
Mello – FOR OVERRIDE
Morfeld – FOR OVERRIDE
Murante – AGAINST OVERRIDE
Nordquist – FOR OVERRIDE
Pansing Brooks – FOR OVERRIDE
Schumacher – FOR OVERRIDE
Seiler – FOR OVERRIDE
Sullivan – FOR OVERRIDE
Williams – FOR OVERRIDE

Voting against LB268
Bloomfield – AGAINST OVERRIDE
Brasch – AGAINST OVERRIDE
Craighead – AGAINST OVERRIDE
Friesen – AGAINST OVERRIDE
Groene – AGAINST OVERRIDE
Hughes – AGAINST OVERRIDE
Kintner – AGAINST OVERRIDE
Kuehn – AGAINST OVERRIDE
McCoy – AGAINST OVERRIDE
Riepe – AGAINST OVERRIDE
Scheer – AGAINST OVERRIDE
Schnoor – AGAINST OVERRIDE
Smith – AGAINST OVERRIDE
Stinner – AGAINST OVERRIDE
Watermeier – AGAINST OVERRIDE